Blog

CMMC 2.0 Year in Review: Lessons Learned and How to Enter 2026 Audit-Ready

Written by Travis Sands | Dec 22, 2025 4:07:58 PM

The clock is ticking on 2025, and one truth has become undeniable: CMMC 2.0 is no longer theoretical. It is enforceable, it is active, and it is dramatically reshaping the competitive landscape of the defense supply chain. This past year served as a vital, often painful, testing ground. We’ve seen firsthand what truly differentiates the organizations that are set up for success from those still trying to catch up.

If your goal is to stride confidently into 2026, audit-ready and secure, then you need to internalize the lessons learned from the early waves of readiness reviews and formal assessments. The complexity is manageable, but only if you adopt a methodical, disciplined approach like this.

The contractors who succeed in 2026 will be the ones who knew exactly where they stood, and what needed fixing, before the stakes got higher.
 
We've guided dozens of defense contractors through this exact transition. Our CMMC prep session gives you a clear-eyed assessment of your current posture, identifies your highest-risk gaps, and delivers a prioritized roadmap you can act on immediately, before your next contract solicitation or audit notification arrives.
 
Don't wait for an auditor to tell you what we can help you fix today. Let's validate your scope, pressure-test your controls, and get your leadership aligned around a winning strategy.
 
Schedule your CMMC prep session now
 

Lesson 1: Scope Confusion is the Root of All Failure

Let's be blunt: Scope missteps remain the number one reason we see organizations run into trouble.

Why does this matter so much? Because many contractors treat scope definition like an IT-only exercise, assuming it just covers the primary network where CUI is stored. But CMMC is holistic. The early audits reinforced what we’ve been saying all along: scope touches your HR systems, your cloud environments, your procurement workflows, even your physical facilities, and certainly, your subcontractors. If a system processes, stores, or transmits CUI, or if it provides security protections for systems that do, it is in scope.

We’ve seen organizations assume a shared drive was fine, only to discover too late that it pulled their entire network into scope, creating massive and costly remediation efforts.

The Insider Takeaway: Your 2026 foundation must be built on absolute precision. You need to map your CUI thoroughly, validating every data flow and every system that interacts with it. That deep knowledge is your greatest defense against audit failure. Don't guess; know exactly where your CUI lives.

Lesson 2: Verification, Not Documentation, Wins the Day

It’s great that you have a comprehensive binder of security policies. It really is. But here’s the reality check: Having policies is necessary, but it is far from sufficient. Auditors are experienced professionals; they are no longer impressed by generic security manuals or aspirational statements. They want proof.

What we’re seeing is a fundamental shift from a "check the box" mentality to a requirement for demonstrated operational consistency. You need to prove that your controls are operating effectively and continuously over time.

This means that logs, comprehensive incident reports, regularly executed access reviews, and verifiable training records are the evidence that separates passing contractors from failing ones. Organizations that treat compliance as a static checklist, instead of a living, breathing system, often stumble badly at this stage.

The Insider Takeaway: Document everything, yes, but more importantly, ensure that your documentation reflects reality. Your security controls should be verifiably operational on any random day, not just the two weeks leading up to the assessment.

Lesson 3: Self-Assessments Still Require Auditor-Level Rigor

The idea that Level 1 or even self-attested Level 2 compliance would be an easy pass led many contractors astray. They saw "self-assessment" and thought "free pass."

We’ve seen early failures that highlight the significant legal and operational risk carried by inaccurate self-assessments. Whether it’s assessed by a C3PAO or self-attested, the standard remains the same: it must be precise, evidence-driven, and completely defensible under scrutiny. Remember, you are legally attesting to the DoD that you meet the requirements.

The Insider Takeaway: If you’re performing a self-assessment, approach it like you’re preparing for a full, formal audit. Validate your scope boundary, confirm all your evidence, and ensure the operational security story you are presenting aligns 100% with how your business runs day-to-day.

Lesson 4: CMMC Must Be Owned by Leadership, Not Just IT

This is perhaps the biggest organizational hurdle we encounter: CMMC is fundamentally a leadership problem, not just an IT task.

The failure to achieve audit success often boils down to a lack of cross-functional ownership. Security, compliance, and evidence generation simply cannot live solely within the IT department. The successful organizations we’ve worked with had clear executive sponsorship, defined accountability across teams, and ongoing, mandated collaboration involving HR, facilities, procurement, and the executive suite.

When compliance is embedded into the way a company runs, when it becomes part of the operational flow, it succeeds. When it’s delegated as an IT side project, it usually fails.

The Insider Takeaway: Engage your leadership now. Making CMMC part of your operational DNA is non-negotiable. Leadership engagement is the critical factor that drives the necessary resource allocation and cultural shift.

Lesson 5: CMMC Readiness is a Marathon, Not a Sprint

The contractors who are positioned best for 2026 are the ones who understand that CMMC 2.0 is not a one-time compliance event.

They aren't just reacting to a deadline; they are building repeatable, auditable, and constantly improving processes that evolve with their business environment. This involves continuous monitoring, periodic internal evidence reviews, and proactively updating scope and policies as their technology or team changes. This approach ensures you are never caught off guard when a new contract opportunity arises or an audit is scheduled.

The Insider Takeaway: Treat CMMC readiness as an ongoing, mature security program, not a project with an end date. Continuous improvement protects your contract eligibility, stabilizes your business pipeline, and builds the resilience that the DoD is looking for.

Entering 2026: Your Call to Action

The message from the trenches of 2025 is clear: the contractors who failed early on didn't fail because the standard was impossible. They failed because they underestimated the scope, overestimated their internal readiness, and delayed taking true, enterprise-wide ownership.

2026 is the year to be proactive. It’s time to move beyond talking about CMMC and start living it.

  1. Map Your CUI: Get forensic about where your CUI is and how it travels.

  2. Validate Your Evidence: Ensure every required control produces proof of continuous operation.

  3. Check Your SPRS: Make sure your System Security Plan (SSP) and reported SPRS score are completely defensible.

  4. Embed Operations: Make CMMC discipline a daily function across every department.

CMMC 2.0 is separating the truly secure businesses from the compliance tourists. The winners in the coming year won't be scrambling to pass an audit; they will be the ones who have already built that trust, discipline, and resilience into their daily flow.

Don't wait for your next contract or an auditor’s report to expose painful gaps. Let’s start validating your scope and engaging your leadership now.